![]() |
Ruralfacts: Estimating
the Cost for Achieving Universal Access
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Over the past 20 years, the national network of centers for independent living has significantly advanced the cause of people with disabilities, and helped countless thousands of individuals with significant disabilities achieve healthy and independent lives. Yet, the residents of 40 % of the nation's counties -- mostly rural counties -- lack basic access to CILs. To achieve universal rural access to ILC services, we estimate an additional investment of approximately $71.5 million will be needed. This estimate is based on the following:
This estimate is based on projections of the number of counties in which services are actually provided. CILs have larger catchment areas (an average of 7.1 counties) than those in which they actually deliver services.3 The following table presents estimates of the cost of establishing universal access to CIL services using both catchment areas and service areas. These estimates are quantitative in nature and do not address the quality or sufficiency of services. It is important to note that the reported median ($328,000), average ($530,000), lowest ($55,000), and typical ($200,000) budgets observed reflect all funds used to operate a center, and not only federal funds.4 1Satellites
include branch offices and outreach locations. Estimates of Funding
Needed to Achieve Universal Access to CIL Services Based on Both Catchment and Service
Areas and at Levels of Funding Reflecting the Lowest, Typical, Median, and Average Budgets.
The estimates are based on the premise of expanding the existing model of CIL services. In some areas, it may be more effective to expand the number of satellite programs operated by existing CILs rather than to create new CILs. Alternative models (e.g. virtual CILs, itinerants, etc.) have also been discussed. Whatever model is used, it is critical for CILs to have a stable financial base that permits them to administer the programs, conduct advocacy, provide core services, and leverage additional funding to address local needs. ReferencesDeJong, G. (1983). Defining the independent living concept. In N.M. Crewe & I.K. Zola (Eds.) Independent Living for Physically Disabled People (4-27). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Innes, W., Enders, A., Seekins, T., Merritt, D., Kirshenbaum, A., & Arnold, N. (under review). A geographic analysis of independent living center services: Urban and rural distribution equity. Missoula, MT: Research and Training Center on Rural Rehabilitation, The University of Montana. National Council on Disability (1997). Achieving Independence: The Challenge for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability. Office of Developmental Programs, Independent Living Branch (1998). Centers for Independent Living. Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Services Administration. Smith, Q., Frieden, L., & Richards, L. (1995). Independent living. In A.E. Dell Orto & R.P. Marinelli (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Disability and Rehabilitation (399-406). New York: MacMillan Library Reference USA. Schwab, L.O. (1983). Developing programs in rural areas. In N.M. Crewe & I.K. Zola (Eds.), Independent Living for Physically Disabled People (4-27). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. For more information , please contact us at: Research and Training
Center on Disability in Rural Communities, This factsheet was prepared by: Tom Seekins , Bill Innes, and Alexandra Enders. This publication is available in Braille, large print, and ASCII DOS text formats. This publication is funded by U.S. Department of Education Grant # H133B70017-01. Opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of NIDRR or the U.S. Department of Education. Questions? Would you like to receive periodic updates about our research and training activities? Do you have comments or suggestions about this site? E-mail your requests, comments and suggestions to Diana Spas or call 888-268-2743 and ask for the Information Coordinator. |
||||||||||||||||